ORAL Accused of Bias for Ignoring Nkrumah's Scandals and Noah's Ark Receipts

The ORAL committee has been accused of selective justice and playing favorites, with NPP communicator Kingsley Amoakwa-Boadu claiming their corruption hunt skips over Nkrumah’s alleged financial misadventures and the murky details surrounding Noah’s Ark procurement. "How can you recover all loot if you’re ignoring the ark’s receipts? Who approved the creation of the VIP deck?" demanded Amoakwa-Boadu, visibly outraged at what he called a timeline-specific witch-hunt, leaving the ORAL committee tongue-tied.

Amoakwa-Boadu’s fiery criticism extended to the ORAL committee’s refusal to dig into Ghana’s older scandals surrounding the first president 68 years ago. "Nkrumah’s administration had its share of shady deals—cocoa vanishing faster than church offerings and cement mysteriously ending up in private mansions. And yet, here we are, focusing only on Akufo-Addo appointees like they invented corruption," he argued, urging the committee to hire archaeologists to expand their scope.

In an interview later in the evening, ORAL Champion Okudzeto Ablakwa, after finding his wits again, described the NPP's complaint as the boldest defense of corruption since Judas pocketed 30 pieces of silver. The ORAL committee maintains that its priority is focusing on "current recoverable assets," but critics argue that they are merely dodging ancient scandals to settle political scores.

Meanwhile, Ghanaians are left wondering if justice will ever be truly timeless, whether the fight against corruption may require both divine intervention and a time machine.